Intent on finding drug leads, Vertex constructed an integrated drug-discovery platform based on understanding the structures of biological targets and then using that understanding to construct complementary compounds and compound libraries more likely to produce lead drug candidates, not simply screening hits. Its extraordinary productivity has led it to adopt a risk-reducing, alliance model, quite unlike the bet-the-farm strategies of most of its peers. Instead of focusing on a few partnerships and a few drugs for its own commercialization, Vertex has spent its time maximizing the number of programs it can put into drug development, largely through partners. To make up for the value it sacrifices by foregoing full commercialization, as well as the risks that its partners might slow development of Vertex programs, it generally insists on full control of the discovery end of R&D as well as a higher-than-average proportion of the products' end sales. Multinationals have generally balked at such deals and so the majority of Vertex's partners have been mid-sized regional players willing to cede discovery responsibilities and a larger share of the profits. But Vertex's $800 million chemogenomics deal with Novartis changes the company's deal and strategic profile; Vertex has complete authority over discovery through phase II; Novartis has control over the later stage. The deal, and its size, effectively validates and defines the Vertex strategy. Still, Vertex's focus on the early side of R&D, with less apparent commitment to creating a product franchise, has hurt its valuation, particularly at a time when investors expect biotech companies to take full advantage of at least some of the products they create.
by Roger Longman
It's not easy to find a negative opinion on Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. , at least among the sell-side analyst...
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on In Vivo for daily insights
Editor’s note: This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.
Mary Jane Hinrichs, Ipsen’s head of early development, talks to In Vivo about getting ahead of the competition by securing deals for candidates before they enter Phase I trials.
Editor’s note: We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in the coverage topics, content format or the method in which you receive and access In Vivo, or if you love it how it is, now is the time to have your voice heard.
The cell and gene therapy (CGT) clinical trial landscape in general and CAR-T cell clinical trials in particular are a special focus for the FDA, EMA, and other regulatory agencies. The whole industry is thus aware of the recent FDA safety investigation and requirements for labeling CAR therapy products.
Bristol Myers Squibb executive Doxie Jordan discusses his path to global commercial leadership and the principles guiding pharmaceutical market strategy
Devika Wood, CEO of Brain+, explains the importance of developing health tech solutions for dementia and the growing need to both raise awareness and improve overall access to nondrug interventions like CST.
In a challenging funding environment for biopharma, strategic dealmaking has become a critical growth engine. In Vivo explores what it truly takes to navigate high-stakes acquisitions and partnerships, drawing on insights from seasoned industry leaders.