Symphony & Guilford Try Out Project Financing
Symphony attempted to re-create an off-P&L financing vehicle for biotech projects that would both pass the much tougher SEC scrutiny applied since the late 1990s and allow biotechs to avoid licensing away what could be important revenue generators. To do so, it had to create a fully independent corporate vehicle with the capacity-through an alliance with an equity-incentivized CRO--to manage its own development. But its first biotech partner, Guilford Pharmaceuticals, didn't feel Symphony had proven the financing could be completely off-P&L. Consolidating the expenses, Guilford sees the deal's value largely in the additional management resources, along with the funding, that Symphony provides a second-priority program. Symphony also has yet to prove it can make its investors money from these projects: in part because the value of late-stage programs has increased since the original off-P&L vehicles were created, Symphony could only get from Guilford a single compound, not a portfolio of projects with which to reduce its investment risk.
You may also be interested in...
Drug firms need to find good homes for hundreds of early-stage experimental compounds that ideally they could claw back once new developers demonstrate proof-of-concept. New project financing funds are clamoring for those assets, but first they must convince LPs to invest in unproven financing models, deal with pharma's accounting demands, and negotiate deals with asset-holders that will provide a decent return.
Big Pharma's being squeezed by deal prices, both for discovery and development assets. And with new capital coming in to fund earlier-stage projects, deals will only get more expensive. But a few forward thinking drug companies are making the seller's market work to their advantage, too, reducing financial exposure and business complexity while upgrading pipelines.
Through what could be a $550 million investment, Invus wants to play for Lexicon the role Roche has played for Genentech, enabling the biotech to finance both its more advanced projects and its discovery programs-something it couldn't do with smaller public market offerings or with lower-value deals on early-stage programs. The financial lynchpin for Invus: the huge prices Big Pharma is willing to pay for Phase II products. Will other private-equity firms follow Invus' lead?