Drug firms don't have a firm grasp of the development of biomarkers or their potential role in clinical decision-making. Nor have they, with few exceptions, looked to the diagnostics industry for help-they've been unwilling to outsource activities related to highly proprietary drug development projects. Moreover, traditionally, drug and diagnostic company alliances haven't fared well because both parties have different value expectations. Small diagnostic companies want biotech-like prices for their contributions; pharma marketers often see diagnostics as limiting to their sales efforts, and certainly something that can take attention away, in a 30-second detail call, from the main event-the higher-priced drug. But an eight-year-old alliance between British drug maker GlaxoSmithKline PLC (GSK) and diaDexus Inc. seems to address these barriers with some novel approaches now starting to bear fruit.
For drug companies, diagnostics are hot tools that can help
maximize R&D productivity and improve their drugs' safety and
efficacy profiles. The ventures funds at Eli Lilly & Co. and Pfizer Inc. have both made diagnostics investments.
Arguably the lack of the relevant biomarker has forced
AstraZeneca PLC to withdraw its
European marketing application for gefitinib
(Iressa)—which does help some people.
But drug firms don't have a firm grasp of the development of biomarkers or their potential role in clinical decision-making....
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on In Vivo for daily insights
Editor’s note: This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.
Mary Jane Hinrichs, Ipsen’s head of early development, talks to In Vivo about getting ahead of the competition by securing deals for candidates before they enter Phase I trials.
Editor’s note: We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in the coverage topics, content format or the method in which you receive and access In Vivo, or if you love it how it is, now is the time to have your voice heard.
The cell and gene therapy (CGT) clinical trial landscape in general and CAR-T cell clinical trials in particular are a special focus for the FDA, EMA, and other regulatory agencies. The whole industry is thus aware of the recent FDA safety investigation and requirements for labeling CAR therapy products.
While the adoption of most favored nation drug pricing in the US stands to affect Japanese biopharma firms now heavily reliant on this market, it might also present an opportunity for pricing and policy reforms at home.
Ovid Therapeutics' president and COO Meg Alexander is leading the company’s strategic pivot toward innovative neurological treatments, potentially creating a new class of medicines for rare neurological disorders.
Thijs Spoor's bet on lead-212 is paying off as Perspective Therapeutics advances three clinical programs with promising early efficacy signals and a comprehensive manufacturing strategy.
