Specialty Pharma: Eating Big Pharma's Lunch, Not Just its Leftovers?

While not yet rivals to Big Pharma when it comes to clinical-stage licensing, spec pharmas have in some individual cases proven to be more favored partners than their Big Pharma competitors.

Since last covered in this space (see "In-Licensing in Specialty Pharma, Revisited," IN VIVO, Nov. 2004 Also see "In-Licensing in Specialty Pharma, Revisited" - In Vivo, 1 November, 2004.), the popularity of the in-licensing focused specialty pharma business model has continued to grow—particularly among venture capital investors, who have grown weary of the vagaries of drug discovery. With eyes on the sales- and acquisition-fueled growth of such specialty pharma successes as cancer specialist MGI Pharma Inc. —whose sales grew 43% in 2005—and Cephalon Inc. —whose 19% growth in 2005 put it over the $1 billion mark for the first time—VCs are largely eschewing platform and discovery-stage companies in favor of those that, while not necessarily staying out of the discovery game altogether (Cephalon and MGI, after all, started as drug discoverers), are focused on market entry, be it via in-licensing, acquisition, or otherwise.

In Exhibit 1, we've broken out in-licensing deal counts and dollar volume by specialty pharma since 2001, splitting the deals by whether the product acquired was already marketed, or in...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on In Vivo for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Archive

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 

Editor’s note: This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Early Development Deals: Ipsen's Strategy For Biomarker-Driven Success

 

Mary Jane Hinrichs, Ipsen’s head of early development, talks to In Vivo about getting ahead of the competition by securing deals for candidates before they enter Phase I trials.   

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 

Editor’s note: We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in the coverage topics, content format or the method in which you receive and access In Vivo, or if you love it how it is, now is the time to have your voice heard.

In Partnership with Cerba Research

Prioritizing Safety in CAR-T Therapy: Patient Monitoring with Cerba Research’s Testing Portfolio

The cell and gene therapy (CGT) clinical trial landscape in general and CAR-T cell clinical trials in particular are a special focus for the FDA, EMA, and other regulatory agencies. The whole industry is thus aware of the recent FDA safety investigation and requirements for labeling CAR therapy products.

More from In Vivo

Medtech Innovators Court London-Based Investors At BioWales 2025

 
• By 

BioWales in London 2025 showcased the efforts healthtech innovators are making to meet investors on their own turf, illustrating changing attitudes and evolving needs.

Rising Leaders 2025: Metsera’s Whit Bernard’s Musical Path To Biotech Leadership

 
• By 

Metsera CEO Whit Bernard applies an unconventional leadership philosophy to develop next-generation obesity therapeutics, including monthly GLP-1 injections and oral peptides.

UK Bets On Regulatory Innovation As Competitive Advantage In Synthetic Biology

 
• By 

The UK government has prioritized synthetic biology and created a "concierge service" for biotechs just as the US cuts science funding.