Is Diagnostics the New Biotech...and Will Pharma Embrace It?

The early biotech industry thrived on a combination of hope and hype while diagnostics, which evolved using many of the same tools, was traditionally viewed -- and priced -- almost as a commodity. Now we're seeing the advent of complex, high-value diagnostics. As the techniques underlying tests increase in their biological complexity and the knowledge base of their developers about specific disease areas deepens, is the value proposition becoming more biotech-like?

During a meeting at her office last February, the CEO of a next-generation diagnostics start-up suggested that high-value diagnostics companies are "the new biotech." Her argument: the field is facing many of the same adoption challenges as the biotech industry did in its early days. The thought resonated on a common-sense level. The underlying technologies defining biotech medicines and diagnostics are similar; in fact they had common starting points, first with the use of antibodies as targeting agents and probes, and later with genomics. In both cases, the same core assumptions existed around using those tools to unlock the power of the biological perspective. Biotech faced an initial hurdle of developing efficient and reproducible manufacturing processes for production scale-up; diagnostics, similarly, needed to automate. And in each case, there was a need for physicians, potential development partners, and regulators to get their arms around a unique and innovative set of promising technologies.

The conversation with the diagnostics CEO led to another, with Risa Stack, PhD, a partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield &...

More from Archive

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 

Editor’s note: This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Early Development Deals: Ipsen's Strategy For Biomarker-Driven Success

 

Mary Jane Hinrichs, Ipsen’s head of early development, talks to In Vivo about getting ahead of the competition by securing deals for candidates before they enter Phase I trials.   

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 

Editor’s note: We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in the coverage topics, content format or the method in which you receive and access In Vivo, or if you love it how it is, now is the time to have your voice heard.

In Partnership with Cerba Research

Prioritizing Safety in CAR-T Therapy: Patient Monitoring with Cerba Research’s Testing Portfolio

The cell and gene therapy (CGT) clinical trial landscape in general and CAR-T cell clinical trials in particular are a special focus for the FDA, EMA, and other regulatory agencies. The whole industry is thus aware of the recent FDA safety investigation and requirements for labeling CAR therapy products.

More from In Vivo

Strategic Surprises: The Drugs That Rewrote The Forecasts

 

Many assets do not meet their pre-launch predictions, either exceeding or falling short of their forecast sales. In this article, In Vivo highlights several historic examples and the factors that influenced their unexpected performance.

Podcast: “They Are Able To Keep Their Body”: Medipost On Its Stem Cell Therapy Vision

 

In Vivo spoke with Edward Ahn, CEO of Medipost, a Korean company that has developed stem cell therapies from cord blood, on how they are working across regulatory markets to provide a novel treatment for degenerative diseases.

Can Italy Shake Off Its Reputation And Become A Premier Hub For Biotech?

 
• By 

Leading industry experts have spoken to In Vivo about how investment, a change in mindset and a fresh approach to policy may allow Italy to kick-start its biotech ecosystem.