Trump's Sights Set On Payers And Pharmas, But Medtechs Must Not Be Complacent

It's been a big month for plans intended to shape the future of health care in the US, with the Trump Administration showcasing its ACA replacement bill and issuing budget proposals. At this stage, it's hard to peg winners and losers and although the focus is squarely on insurance, the medtech sector should guard against complacency, says ZS Associates' Brian Chapman.

Capitol House

A month after Donald Trump's election as US President last November, In Vivo asked Brian Chapman, ZS Associates' principal and leader of the firm's medical products consulting practice, for an early take on how medtech businesses and the sector in general would be affected by decisions likely to emerge from the new US administration and its three-line Republican monopoly. (Also see "US Medtech Under Trump: Below The Radar Or In The Line Of Fire?" - In Vivo, 12 December, 2016.)

At that early stage, it was hard to make any predictions, although the laser focus was already on insurance reform....

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on In Vivo for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Market Access

Crisis Or Opportunity? US MFN Policy Could Test Japan’s Appetite For Reforms

 
• By 

While the adoption of most favored nation drug pricing in the US stands to affect Japanese biopharma firms now heavily reliant on this market, it might also present an opportunity for pricing and policy reforms at home.

AI In Health Delivery: Patients Most Confident When HCPs Are In Charge

 
• By 

Annual survey of patients and professionals shows how attitudes to health system transformation are evolving and what stakeholders are demanding as acceptance of AI tools accelerates.

US Health System Redesign Critical, NAM’s Medical Experts Warn Trump Government

 
• By 

The whirlwind back-and-forth on US tariffs and Robert F. Kennedy jr.’s plans to deregulate health care have become all-preoccupying, but the National Academy of Medicine was first to set out President Trump’s health administration priorities.

Future Of 340B Rebate Models Hinges On Regulatory Decision Point

 
• By 

As pharmaceutical companies seek to transform how drug discounts are delivered under the 340B program, a federal ruling reinforces HRSA's authority. The industry must now wait for critical guidance from the Trump administration that could reshape compliance strategies and financial outcomes.

More from In Vivo

Crisis Or Opportunity? US MFN Policy Could Test Japan’s Appetite For Reforms

 
• By 

While the adoption of most favored nation drug pricing in the US stands to affect Japanese biopharma firms now heavily reliant on this market, it might also present an opportunity for pricing and policy reforms at home.

Rising Leaders 2025: Ovid’s Meg Alexander On Neurology’s Next Frontier

 
• By 

Ovid Therapeutics' president and COO Meg Alexander is leading the company’s strategic pivot toward innovative neurological treatments, potentially creating a new class of medicines for rare neurological disorders.

The Goldilocks Isotope: Perspective Therapeutics’ ‘Just Right’ Alpha Radiotherapeutic

 
• By 

Thijs Spoor's bet on lead-212 is paying off as Perspective Therapeutics advances three clinical programs with promising early efficacy signals and a comprehensive manufacturing strategy.