Using Data To Improve Rare Disease Diagnosis And Treatment

A deeper understanding of rare diseases – how they differ across geographies and ethnicities, or which genes and biomarkers are most useful targets for new treatments – can help to accelerate and de-risk clinical trials. On the commercial front, patient data and insights could mean the difference between a category leader and a failure.

DNA test graphic

Rare diseases are uncommon by nature: no physician can be expected to know implicitly what is wrong with every patient that walks through his or her door, or who appears in a telehealth chat window. The biopharmaceutical industry, due to structural issues both corporate and legal, tend to focus on geographic markets; regulatory requirements reinforce this approach, since most countries require clinical trials conducted on local populations, as a condition of approval.

Rare diseases are any disease, disorder, illness or condition affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the US, as defined by the Orphan Drug Act of 1983. In the European Union, a disease is considered rare if it affects less than five individuals per 10,000. Most rare diseases have a genetic basis, affecting as many as 400 million people worldwide -- including 30 million in Europe and 25 million in the US – according to a World Health Organization estimate. Only 74 rare congenital or genetic diseases have an approved therapy, accounting for less than 3% of all such diseases, according to Datamonitor Healthcare.

Diseases, however, do not respect borders, a fact which COVID-19 has painfully demonstrated over the last 18 months. Similarly, rare...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on In Vivo for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Market Intelligence

Strategic Surprises: The Drugs That Rewrote The Forecasts

 

Many assets do not meet their pre-launch predictions, either exceeding or falling short of their forecast sales. In this article, In Vivo highlights several historic examples and the factors that influenced their unexpected performance.

AI In Biologics Discovery: The Expensive Bet On Unproven Promise

 
• By 

Despite limited evidence of commercial impact, pharmaceutical companies are making massive strategic investments in AI biologics platforms. The question isn't whether the technology shows promise; it's whether that promise can translate to measurable business results.

BioBytes: AI-Related Deals In Q2 ‘25

 
• By 

When it came to AI-related deals, the second quarter of 2025 was characterized by mostly modest financings.

Titans Of Pharma: Lilly’s Ricks Tops Big Pharma Pay Chart

 

The big pharma CEO with the highest-valued compensation in 2024 was David Ricks of Eli Lilly, while Pfizer and J&J executives slipped into third and fourth place behind AbbVie's now retired chief Richard Gonzalez. European firms brought up the rear.

More from In Vivo

Deals In Depth: June 2025

 
• By 

Five $1bn+ alliances were penned in June, and four exceeded $2bn.

Global Pharma Interest In Korea Undeterred Despite Political Roller Coaster

 
• By 

Despite recent political turmoil, outside investor and corporate interest in South Korean biopharma innovation appears robust or even increasing.

Podcast: Oxolife’s Agnés Arbat, Winner Of The European Prize For Women Innovators

 
• By 

Agnès Arbat, CEO of Oxolife and winner of the EU Women Innovators Prize, joins In Vivo to discuss OXO-001, a novel non-hormonal treatment aimed at improving embryo implantation in IVF. She shares insights from her biotech journey and the future of fertility innovation.