M. Nielsen Hobbs
Interim Editor-in-Chief, Pink Sheet
Nielsen has been covering the pharmaceutical industry most of his life, reporting on everything from ANDAs to Zika vaccines. He strongly believes that the user fee system needs to stop using Roman numerals. His favorite stories are ones that help readers understand the personalities and policies that dictate whether their regulatory strategy succeeds or fails. A regular contributor to the Pink Sheet podcast, he also creates infographics and editorial feature images for articles. Before joining Pink Sheet he worked for Congressional Quarterly. Nielsen frequently moderates webinars and panels at industry conferences, and enjoys discussing R2-D2 almost as much as he enjoys talking about 351(k).
Latest From M. Nielsen Hobbs
Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week
This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.
Diversity Action Plans: What To Submit And When
With the deadline for comments on the US FDA’s draft guidance less than a month away, the Pink Sheet offers an infographic outlining what the agency is expecting in diversity action plans and when that might be implemented.
Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey
We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in coverage topics, article format, or the method in which you access the Pink Sheet – or if you love it how it is – now is the time to have your voice heard.
US FDA Guidance On Artificial Intelligence For Regulatory Decision-Making Expected This Year
Draft guidance will offer a risk-based framework for accessing the credibility of AI and help ensure that AI models used to answer regulatory questions are sufficiently credible for a particular ‘context of use,’ CDER’s Tala Fakhouri says.
Pink Sheet Podcast: What’s In And Out Of US FDA’s Diversity Action Plan Guidance, AI Guidance Also Coming
Pink Sheet reporter and editors discuss what the FDA included in its long-awaited guidance on clinical trial diversity action plans, along with what was left out, as well as an upcoming guidance on the use of artificial intelligence in regulatory decision-making.
US FDA Guidance On Artificial Intelligence For Regulatory Decision-Making Expected This Year
Draft guidance will offer a risk-based framework for accessing the credibility of AI and help ensure that AI models used to answer regulatory questions are sufficiently credible for a particular ‘context of use,’ CDER’s Tala Fakhouri says.